Quantcast
Channel: Biodiversity Heritage Library
Viewing all 926 articles
Browse latest View live

Nicolas-Edme Roret: Insects and Natural History Manuals

$
0
0
Atlas des insectes, composé de 110 planches, représentant la plupart des insectes décrits dans le Manuel d'histoire naturelle et dans le Manuel d'entomologie. Digitized by Library of Congress. http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/39708448.

By: Tomoko Steen
Science Section
Science, Technology and Business Division 
The Library of Congress

Atlas des insectes, composé de 110 planches, représentant la plupart des insectes décrits dans le Manuel d'histoire naturelle et dans le Manuel d'entomologie [Translation: Atlas of insects, consisting of 110 plates, representing most of the insects described in the Natural History Manual and the Manual of Entomology] was digitized from the Library of Congress (LC)’s collection on May 1st, 2012 by the Internet Archive and included in the Biodiversity Heritage Library (BHL).

Atlas des insectes, composé de 110 planches, représentant la plupart des insectes décrits dans le Manuel d'histoire naturelle et dans le Manuel d'entomologie. Digitized by Library of Congress. http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/39708346.

One of the oldest publications scanned from the LC’s collections and added to BHL, this early natural history publication includes 110 plates of various insects. The publisher, Nicolas-Edme Roret, is a French publisher most known for an important series of manuals (Encyclopédie Roret or Manuels Roret), which are dedicated to diverse subjects including science, art, crafts, culture, and more. Atlas des insectes illustrates many of the insects described in Pierre Boitard's Manuel d'entomologie, ou Histoire naturelle des insectes (1828) - which it was meant to accompany - as part of Roret's Manuels. The text and plates were republished as new editions within L'Encyclopédie Roret in 1843 and 1844 (respectively).


Atlas des insectes, composé de 110 planches, représentant la plupart des insectes décrits dans le Manuel d'histoire naturelle et dans le Manuel d'entomologie. Digitized by Library of Congress. http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/39708312

Roret moved to Paris while he was a still young man to work in the library of his brother, Pierre-Jean Ferra. In 1815, he obtained a position at a large library of the Palais Royal, in Arthus-Bertrand, where he was assigned to be the chief clerk. He then moved on to become a bookseller and a licensed publisher in 1820 (license No 1419). In 1822, with his experience as a licensed publisher, Roret became an editor and published a variety of natural history books. His projects were often funded by his cousin Pierre Deterville, another bookseller and publisher. Deterville held rare natural history texts including those of Buffon (1707-1788), Jean Baptiste Lamarck (1744-1829) and Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778). Roret also edited and published Suites à Buffon (also issued under the title of Nouvelles Suites à Buffon), which involved naturalists such as Pierre André Latreille (1762-1833), Charles-Nicolas-Sigisbert Sonnini Manoncourt (1751-1812), Charles-François Brisseau Mirbel (1776-1854), Louis Augustin Guillaume Bosc (1759-1828) and René Richard Castel Louis (1758-1832).

Atlas des insectes, composé de 110 planches, représentant la plupart des insectes décrits dans le Manuel d'histoire naturelle et dans le Manuel d'entomologie. Digitized by Library of Congress. http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/39708468.

Reference: Bulletin des Bibliothèques de France : 1997 - Paris, t. 42, n° 02.; Le Vitrail et les traités du Moyen Âge à nos jours. Corpus Vitrearum. XXIIIe colloque international. Tours 3-7 Juillet 2006.

BHL Receives Funding to Host National Digital Stewardship Residency (NDSR) Cohort

$
0
0
The Biodiversity Heritage Library (BHL), led by the Ernst Mayr Library of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University (MCZ), will host a National Digital Stewardship Residency (NDSR) cohort as part of the Laura Bush 21st Century Librarian Program, funded by the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS). Entitled “Foundations to Actions: Extending Innovations in Digital Libraries in Partnership with NDSR Learners,” the program will include five geographically-distributed residents, all graduates of LIS or related master's programs, in a collaborative project to improve tools, curation, and content stewardship at BHL. This work will help support the development of BHL Version 2 (BHL v.2), the next generation of the world’s largest open access digital library for biodiversity literature.



Residents will be hosted by the Field Museum of Natural History and the Chicago Botanic Garden, Harvard University, Missouri Botanical Garden, Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History, and Smithsonian Libraries. The project will run from 1 June 2016-31 May 2018, with residents at host institutions for twelve months, from 1 January 2017-31 December 2017.

Each host institution will provide mentorship to a resident for a specific project designed to improve the functionality of BHL and will identify how tools and processes may be transferred to or from other digital library and museum environments. Outcomes will include a best practices guidelines document for digital libraries incorporating transcriptions, image searching, collection analysis techniques and better connections to museums, archives, and other relevant databases. Better functionality for BHL, based on user needs, will feed into other data systems and provide enhancements for BHL biodiversity and library partners such as the Encyclopedia of Life (EOL), Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF), Digital Public Library of America (DPLA), and Europeana.

The BHL NDSR cohort will work together with mentors to plan BHL v.2 and characterize the tools necessary to improve data management and reuse. The Chicago partners’ resident, which will be co-hosted by the Field Museum of Natural History and the Chicago Botanic Garden, will address content and gap analysis, reviewing the domain of biodiversity literature underpinning the field of biodiversity, estimating the amount of that literature in the public domain, and exploring methodologies to visualize digital collections. The Harvard University MCZ resident will develop methodologies and propose tools for verification and integration of crowd-sourced data corrections, building on previous work undertaken by the Ernst Mayr Library and the Missouri Botanical Garden (MBG). The MBG resident will explore user interface modifications to the BHL portal to enable image searching, browsing, and display. The Los Angeles County Natural History Museum resident will consult with BHL partners such as DPLA and Europeana to determine how BHL data works in these large-scale digital libraries and categorize high value tools and services. Finally, the Smithsonian resident will work with the BHL Secretariat to determine additional digital library needs and services that will provide increased value to a broader set of BHL users.

The Laura Bush 21st Century Librarian Program (LB21) supports professional development, graduate education and continuing education to help libraries and archives develop the human capital capacity they need to meet the changing learning and information needs of the American public. Through a strong mentorship focus, and by providing opportunities to connect with professionals in biodiversity fields as well as libraries, museums, and archives, the BHL NDSR residencies will establish new leaders with skills in digital stewardship related to collection development and services, archives management, data curation, information systems management, informatics and community management, and distributed, virtual collaboration. In addition to fostering digital stewardship skills in these new graduates, the residencies will result in enhancements to BHL such as innovative tools, services, and best practices to trigger the development of BHL v.2, while providing users with improved interfaces, data discovery, and database connections.

Program resident positions will be posted to a variety of academic outlets and listservs on 1 August 2016. Follow this blog and BHL on Twitter and Facebook for updates on position postings and application instructions. You can learn more about the program on the IMLS website or the BHL public wiki.

Information about Upcoming Changes to BHL Commenting Feature

$
0
0

Summary 


A new and enhanced commenting system is being planned for BHL. The current commenting system will be disabled on July 5.

More Information 


In December 2015, we launched the ability to add comments to pages in BHL books. Our audience has since used this feature to provide details about taxonomic changes, link field notes to crowdsourced transcriptions, and provide species and common name information for scientific illustrations.

Our community has both demonstrated the value of having a commenting feature in BHL and helped identify the need for additional functionality that is not supported by the current system. In order to respond to this feedback and address residual technical issues, we have decided to implement a new and enhanced commenting system as part of BHL Version 2, the next iteration of the world’s largest open access digital library for biodiversity literature.

We will be disabling the current system from the BHL website on July 5. This strategic decision allows us to focus development time on implementing an enhanced system without the need to provide continued support for the existing platform. Requirements gathering for the new system will begin in early 2017 as part of the work of the BHL NDSR resident program. We will provide updates via this blog and social media.

While the current system will no longer be available in BHL as of July 5, all comments added to BHL pages to date will remain available through the BHL Disqus profile. Those comments on Disqus will also remain linked to the corresponding BHL pages, meaning that you can still access the information that our communities have added via these comments and explore the related pages in BHL. We will also be archiving these existing comments with the plan to re-ingest them into BHL once the new commenting system is implemented.

We want to extend a huge thanks to everyone who has contributed comments to BHL, demonstrating the value that such a system has for our community. We’re excited about the way commenting allows our audience to share their expertise and enhance our collections, and we look forward to incorporating the feedback we’ve received from our users into the design of the next generation of our commenting system.

Questions? Feel free to submit feedback.

Digging into the personal writings of a 19th century ornithologist

$
0
0
Tuesday, June 12, 1866 
A.M. pleasant P.M. cloudy. Studied part of P.M. Went to circus in evening & saw a hippopotamus for the first time. Got four warbling vireos before breakfast. The algebra is now rather hard. 
(Diaries of William Brewster). 

William Brewster. The Auk. v. 37 (1920). Digitized by Smithsonian Libraries. http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/15938473 

As a teen in Cambridge, Massachusetts during the 1860s, William Brewster (1851-1919) woke up early to collect birds before school, practiced taxidermy with friends, and carefully noted the dates when local plants flowered and produce ripened in the family garden.

His early fascination for birds and his observant note-taking laid the groundwork for his career as a prominent amateur ornithologist. He would become the first president of the Massachusetts Audubon Society and a co-founder and president of the American Ornithologists’ Union.

An ongoing project at the Ernst Mayr Library of Harvard University’s Museum of Comparative Zoology has been the digitization and transcription of Brewster’s diaries, field journals, and correspondences. Some of these journals and diaries are available to read on the Biodiversity Heritage Library, and we are working toward making all his notes and correspondences digitally accessible for study.

Over the course of his life, Brewster saw Massachusetts landscape and ecology change dramatically. Cambridge developed from farmland to urban city, and House Sparrows introduced from Europe decimated the farmers’ beloved Eastern Bluebirds. These kinds of observations about land use and animal presence, as well as his notes on plants and weather, make the Brewster collection a valuable resource for scientists studying ecological change.

Brewster published articles prolifically in scientific publications such as the ornithological journal, the Auk. In his field notes and journals, we can find the stories that lie behind those scientific papers: they document the development of a scientist, professionally and personally. They reveal his relationships with other scientists, document in detail what a typical day’s work looked like, and are sprinkled with amusing observations, beautiful scenes, and personal insights that would not necessarily be documented in a scientific publication.

These three bird stories illustrate the value of records where the scientific and the personal overlap.

Pine Grosbeak: Nature Writing and Scientific Work 


Pine Grosbeak illustration from Field book of wild birds and their music. London, G.P. Putnam's Sons [c1921]. Digitized by Smithsonian Libraries. biodiversitylibrary.org/page/13653735

For a few days in January of 1893, Cambridge and Boston were abuzz with an unfamiliar sight: hundreds of red and gold birds that drew lots of attention from residents.

Brewster recognized them as Pine Grosbeaks. In the winter, large foraging flocks of Pine Grosbeaks often strip entire trees of their fruits, crushing through pulp and seeds and moving on when the food source has been exhausted.

Brewster observes:
“There were a good many Pine Grosbeaks scattered along the line of ashtrees on the ridge to my left and as I approached Mt. Auburn Street their numbers increased until upon reaching Mr. Hayes's place I found the trees literally alive with them.  
Soon after I stopped to look at them they began flying from every direction into a large white ash which stands near the foot of the avenue. This tree was loaded with fruit and with snow clinging to the fruit clusters and to every twig. In a few minutes it supported also more than a hundred Grosbeaks which distributed themselves quite evenly over every part from drooping lower to the upright upper branches and began shelling out and swallowing the seeds. 
The rejected wings floated down in showers and soon began to give the surface of the snow beneath a light brownish tinge.The snow clinging to the twigs and branches was also quickly dislodged by the movements, of the active, heavy birds and for the first few minutes it was continually flashing out in puffs like steam from a dozen different points at once. The finer particles, sifting slowly down, filled the still air and enveloped the entire tree in a gauzy veil or mist tinted, where the sun-beams pierced it, with rose, salmon and orange, elsewhere of a soft, dead white and of incredible delicacy and beauty, truly a fitting drapery for this winter picture- the hardy Grosbeaks at their morning meal.  
They worked in silence when undisturbed and so very busily that at the end of an hour they had actually eaten or shaken off nearly half the entire crop of seeds. Some men employed in a marble cutter's shop near the tree were neglecting their tasks to watch and discuss them. One of these men told me that a few Grosbeaks were seen in the tree late yesterday afternoon.” (Cambridge, January 10, 1893.) [Edited with paragraph breaks and punctuation for readability.] 

A sudden, unexpected appearance of a large flock non-resident birds is known in the ornithological world as an irruption. (In recent years in Massachusetts, we’ve often heard the word irruption used to describe an unexpected influx of snowy owls that aren’t our usual residents.) Details on a historical irruption of Pine Grosbeaks may be of value to modern day scientists looking back in time for trends. 

But while Brewster often recorded bird sightings as lists or in simple, factual paragraphs, some of the scientific observations are rendered with an artistry that carries them into the genre of nature writing. The image of the tree alive with birds, the rosy quality of light in the snowy air, and the excitement of the marble cutters makes these bird notes especially memorable.

The journal entries for these days form the basis of an article he had published in the Auk two years later, ‘A remarkable flight of Pine Grosbeaks (Pinicola enucleator)’. While Brewster’s article reads as somewhat more fact-driven, it’s written as a personal narrative that draws heavily on his notes, and it contains a condensed version of the visual description shared above.

It seems to be fairly normal at that time for published scientific work to include personal narrative and assertions which we would edit out today. But letters between Brewster and ornithologist friends reveal that they critiqued each other’s work not only on the reliability of their data but also on the style of their prose. Brewster’s scientific journals suggest that personal note-taking was a crucial opportunity to practise the art of writing, and digging into these journal entries allows us a glimpse into a scientist’s thinking and writing process.

American Robin: Personal Musings and Anthropomorphization 


Bluebird and American Robin illustration from Field book of wild birds and their music. London, G.P. Putnam's Sons [c1921]. Digitized by Smithsonian Libraries. biodiversitylibrary.org/page/13653780

Brewster carefully documented wild encounters with blow-by-blow details about animals’ behavior. Beyond behavioral data, his personal writings also include his interpretations of animal ‘personalities’ that reveal both his scientific perspective on animal cognition, and his personal feelings about interactions with animals.

Take for example this short but resonant excerpt from a letter penned to a friend:
"It is sunset and as I sit in my study in the Museum a Robin is singing in an elm in the garden. What a hopeful, earnest strain! It always cheers and encourages me. Our Robin must have a brave heart and a pure conscience." (William Brewster, March 26, 1893. Cambridge, Mass. in correspondence to his friend, ornithologist Frank Michler Chapman.) 

His comment on the “brave heart and a pure conscience” certainly isn’t a piece of scientific data (it’s anthropomorphization, an interpretation of animal behaviors using the logic of human emotions) --but it unearths a very human part of the story to consider how a natural scientist reacted emotionally to his subjects in daily life.

Toucan: Perspectives on Scientific Collecting 


Toucan illustration from Album de aves amazonicas. Zürich: Impressão do Instituto Polygraphico a.g., 1900-06. Digitized by Smithsonian Libraries. biodiversitylibrary.org/page/13804665

If you’ve ever browsed the galleries at Harvard’s Museum of Natural History, then you’ve passed by Brewster’s life’s work. After working as an animal specimen curator for the museum for many years, he also bequeathed his personal collection of birds and other animals to the museum.

Taxidermy collections like Brewsters’ are the foundation of zoology and are invaluable for scientific researchers today. For example, scientists can analyse DNA samples from historic specimens to track evolutionary changes, and look for traces of environmental chemicals such as pesticides to learn more about their ecological impact. (These are just two of many ways that collections can be used for beneficial research--to learn more, read ‘Natural history collections – why are they relevant?’ on The Guardian, or visit the page ‘Why Collections Matter?’ on the Society for the Preservation of Natural History Collections’ website.)

While Brewster strongly advocated for the importance of scientific collecting, his journals also illustrate changes in his collecting practices over time, including the adoption of complementary methods like photography.

In March 1886, just a month after the Massachusetts Audubon Society for the Protection of Birds had organized, Brewster wrote three letters to an ornithologist friend, describing an early attempt to pass bird protection legislation in Massachusetts. Brewster advocated in court for a bill that would ban the hunting of birds for decorative use on women’s hats, but allow scientific collection by permit-holders.

In one of these letters, he scoffs at the idea of only studying birds observationally:
“One of these [Fish & Game Commissioners]... announced at the beginning that he considered Science a humbug and that the best was to study bird was with an opera glass!” (Cambridge, March 7, 1886. Letter to George Sennet.) 

However, his journals reveal that around the 1890s he seems to have developed some mindfulness of how damaging over-hunting could be for animal populations. Around this time he began to collect birds more sparingly and took up the challenge of wildlife photography in the field.

An interesting example of this shift in his attitude occurred during an 1894 collecting trip to the tropics:
“I started out early this morning with the express intention of shooting a toucan. Rather curiously I had at once an opportunity which I did not improve and shortly afterwards a experience which is probably rare for Mr. Chapman [Frank Chapman] has seen nothing of the kind, nor has Mr. Carr either for that matter.  
It all happened in this [way]. I went first to the ajoupa to get my collecting basket and while there heard a toucan calling apparently at a considerable distance. I started in the direction of the sound but I had gone scarce twenty yards when I became conscious that it came from nearly over head.  
Looking up I at once saw the beautiful great bird sitting in the top of a bois immortel its breast turned towards the rising sun which brought out the brilliant colouring of the plumage, the shining black of the large bill and the blue of the bare skin about the eyes with the greatest distinctness.  
Here was my chance for the bird was not thirty yards off but I simply stood and stared at him with speechless wonder and admiration until he finally flew, when the dense cacao foliage prevented my getting a shot.  
Clearly a case of Toucan "fever" but I did not regret the episode.” (Trinidad, March 20, 1894.) [Edited with paragraph breaks and punctuation for readability.] 

* * * 

The Brewster collection, and other field journals and notes, contain a wealth of information beyond useful scientific data. They reveal scientific paradigms, study methods and reasoning; information about working relationships between scientists; and historical and biographical information, including personal thoughts and feelings. Some sections can be fairly dry, but some make for pretty good reading.

If you’ve enjoyed these excerpts, an ongoing blog post series on Mayr Library blog highlights interesting tidbits from Brewster’s writing as we continue to digitize and transcribe the collection. -

By:
Elizabeth Meyer 
Ernst Mayr Library, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University
Project Assistant

BHL Adds Three New Affiliates

$
0
0
Over the past three months, BHL has welcomed three new Affiliates: Smithsonian Institution Archives, the Canadian Museum of Nature, and Národní Muzeum (National Museum, Prague). The BHL consortium now consists of sixteen Members and thirteen Affiliates.

Smithsonian Institution Archives



The Smithsonian Institution Archives captures, preserves and makes available to the public the history of the Smithsonian since its inception in 1846. The Archives holds approximately 39,000 cubic feet of records and nearly 3 million photographic images. The collections include official records of the Smithsonian; personal papers of individuals associated with the Smithsonian; oral and video histories; and other special materials that document the staff, research, events, exhibitions and facilities of the Smithsonian. Detailed descriptions of the collections can be found online through the Archives’ website and through the Collections Search Center.

Smithsonian Institution Archives is a long-standing collaborator with BHL through The Field Book Project - an initiative to increase accessibility to field book content that documents natural history. To date, nearly 800 field books from Smithsonian collections have been contributed to BHL by The Field Book Project.  This material complements the published literature in BHL and provides opportunities to connect publications, primary source material, and specimens held in Smithsonian collections and others around the world. Many of these field notes are being transcribed by the public through the Smithsonian’s Transcription Center.

Canadian Museum of Nature



The Canadian Museum of Nature holds one of the oldest natural history collections in Canada, tracing its beginnings to 1842 with the formation of the Geological Survey of Canada. Consisting of over 36,000 monographic titles and 2,000 periodicals, the Museum's library collection focuses on biology, biodiversity, botany, conservation and care of collections, ecology, mineral sciences, natural history, paleobiology, wildlife and zoology, with particular subject strengths in the Canadian Arctic, ornithology, systematics and taxonomy. The library also includes a Rare Book Collection that consists of approximately 4,000 pre-20th century monographs, manuscripts and periodicals dating back to the 1500s and covering expeditions, natural history, and biological and earth sciences.

The Canadian Museum of Nature represents BHL's first Partner in Canada. This affiliation expands BHL's global presence, extending our ability to provide free and open access to natural history collections from around the world. CMN will serve as a national leader positioned to foster new relationships with other institutions across the country in order to expand Canadian participation in BHL.

Národní Muzeum (National Museum, Prague)



Founded in 1818, the National Museum in Prague is the largest museum in the Czech Republic. The Museum consists of five specialised institutes - the Natural History Museum, the Historical Museum, the Library of the National Museum, the Náprstek Museum of Asian, African and American Cultures (part of the National Museum since 1932), and the Czech Museum of Music (part of the National Museum since 1984) - and several technical and administrative sections. The collections consist of almost 20 million objects from the disciplines of natural history, history, archaeology, arts, music, librarianship and a large archive. The National Museum Library is the second largest historic library in the Czech Republic, with a collection consisting of over 2.5 million items.

The National Museum in Prague (NMP) has actively participated in BHL Europe since 2009. NMP's Scientific Secretary, Dr. Jiří Frank, serves as the BHL Europe representative to the Global BHL Committee, and under his leadership, NMP is helping to facilitate the ongoing participation of European institutions within BHL's global framework. NMP also represents BHL in the Consortium of European Taxonomic Facilities (CETAF) and, as a major partner within the ESFRI (European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures) proposal for pan-European natural history collections infrastructure, is positioned to help connect BHL resources with other natural history collections and taxonomic services.

BHL Receives Digital Library Federation (DLF) 2016 Community/Capacity Award

$
0
0
We are excited to announce that BHL has been named a joint-winner of the inaugural Digital Library Federation (DLF) 2016 Community/Capacity Award, along with the American Archive of Public Broadcasting (AAPB)!

During the month of June, DLF member organizations voted on an impressive list of 16 nominees to determine the award winner. In a tie-vote, the DLF community selected BHL and AAPB as the first-ever winners of the Community/Capacity Award.

According to the DLF website, the DLF Community/Capacity Award honors "constructive, community-minded capacity-building in digital libraries, archives, and museums: efforts that contribute to our ability to collaborate across institutional lines and work toward larger goals and a better future, together." The award recognizes community spirit, generosity, openness, and care for fellow digital library, archives, and museum practitioners and the publics and missions those practitioners serve.

This year's 16 nominees, which were solicited via an open call, included organizations, projects, and individuals from a vast array of disciplines. You can see the list of nominees here: https://www.diglib.org/archives/11856/.

BHL and AAPB will be recognized during an award ceremony at the 2016 DLF Forum, which will be held this November in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. A BHL representative will be present at the ceremony to accept the award on BHL's behalf.

We are honored to be selected alongside the American Archive of Public Broadcasting from amongst this outstanding group of nominees as a DLF Community/Capacity Award winner! Thank you to everyone who submitted nominations and voted on the award winners. We extend our congratulations to AAPB, salute each of our fellow nominees, and thank DLF for creating this opportunity to showcase the power of collaboration for community and capacity building and the advancement of libraries and librarianship.

Lastly, we want to congratulate each member of our BHL family. We believe this award recognizes not only the outstanding work and dedication of each BHL consortium participant and staff contributor, without whom BHL would not be possible, but, more importantly, the BHL family's collaborative spirit and collective efforts to make a positive and powerful impact on the library and science communities. By working collaboratively, we can accomplish what cannot be accomplished individually, and together, we will continue to enhance library communities and practices and ensure that everyone, everywhere has free and open access to the world's biodiversity knowledge.

Learn more about AAPB, BHL, and DLF

The American Archive of Public Broadcasting 
The American Archive of Public Broadcasting, led by WGBH and the Library of Congress, has coordinated a national effort to preserve and make accessible significant historical content created by public media and are preserving at-risk public broadcasting before its content is lost to posterity. To date, more than 40,000 hours of content contributed by more than 100 organizations across the country have been digitized. The entire collection is accessible on location at WGBH and the Library of Congress. Together, WGBH, the Library, and participating organizations have made more than 12,000 programs available online for research, educational and informational purposes, becoming a focal point for discoverability of historical public media content. Learn more.

The Biodiversity Heritage Library 
An international consortium of over two dozen organizations, the Biodiversity Heritage Library (BHL) stands out not only in service to its partners, but also in its collaborative approach to making open access, often rare and unique biodiversity content available to 120,000+ monthly users worldwide. A signatory of the Bouchout Declaration, BHL’s commitment to open access extends beyond placing scanned pages on its website. Content is available via Internet Archive, Digital Public Library of America, and Europeana; over 100,000 scientific illustrations via Flickr; and BHL’s suite of APIs brings data directly to users. To build capacity among partners, BHL also provides intensive digitization workshops, reaching participants from across Sub-Saharan Africa, Mexico, the U.S., and beyond, and supporting participation by institutions large and small. Learn more.

Digital Library Federation
The Digital Library Federation is a robust and diverse community of practitioners who advance research, learning, and the public good through the creative design and wise application of digital library technologies. DLF serves as a resource and catalyst for collaboration among its institutional members, and all who are invested in the success of libraries, museums, and archives in the digital age. DLF serves its parent organization, the Council on Library and Information Resources, as the place where CLIR’s broader information-community strategies are informed and enriched by digital library practice. DLF connects CLIR’s vision and research agenda with our active practitioner network, and brings the insights of the DLF community to bear. In addition, we partner closely on key CLIR initiatives related to DLF’s mission, in order to provide advice and expertise to CLIR from the digital library community, as well as connections and opportunities for our members. DLF currently includes 151 institutional members. Learn more.

Information about Upcoming Changes to BHL API

$
0
0
The BHL API will be updated on 25 July 2016 to support changes to the BHL site. These changes will accommodate identifying additional Contributors for Items and Parts of items.

First are changes to the API that may affect your existing processes.

The Contributor and ContributorID elements in the result sets of API methods that return "Part" information will move. ContributorID will be included as a PartIdentifier in the Identifiers list. Contributor will be included in a new Contributors list.

These changes are being made to accommodate more than one contributor per part.  For example, if one institution researches/compiles the data and a second institution facilitates the inclusion of that data in BHL, both institutions may be listed as a contributor.  Initially, no more than two contributors per part will be allowed, but by adopting these changes to API responses we allow for additional (unlimited, actually) contributors in the future.

Here is an example that shows how the API responses are changing.  The examples shown here are an output of the GetPartMetadata method, and have been abbreviated for clarity.

Original API Results – highlighted elements are being moved:

<Response>
<Status>ok</Status>
<Result>
<PartUrl>
http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/1
</PartUrl>
<PartID>1</PartID>
<ItemID>22498</ItemID>
<StartPageID>3190776</StartPageID>
<SequenceOrder>1</SequenceOrder>
<Contributor>BioStor</Contributor>
<ContributorID>4443</ContributorID>
<GenreName>Article</GenreName>
<Title>
Notes on certain species of Tetragnatha
(Araneae, Argiopidae) in Central America
and Mexico
</Title>
<ContainerTitle>Breviora</ContainerTitle>
<Volume>67</Volume>
<Date>1957</Date>
<PageRange>1--4</PageRange>
<StartPageNumber>1</StartPageNumber>
<EndPageNumber>4</EndPageNumber>
<Authors> [...] </Authors>
<Subjects />
<Identifiers>
<PartIdentifier>
<IdentifierName>ISSN</IdentifierName>
<IdentifierValue>0006-9698</IdentifierValue>
</PartIdentifier>
</Identifiers>
<Pages> [...] </Pages>
<RelatedParts />
</Result>
</Response>

Updated API Results – Highlighted elements are the new locations of the moved data:

<Response>
<Status>ok</Status>
<Result>
<PartUrl>
http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/969
</PartUrl>
<PartID>1</PartID>
<ItemID>22498</ItemID>
<StartPageID>3190776</StartPageID>
<SequenceOrder>1</SequenceOrder>
<GenreName>Article</GenreName>
<Title>
Notes on certain species of Tetragnatha
(Araneae, Argiopidae) in Central America
and Mexico
</Title>
<ContainerTitle>Breviora</ContainerTitle>
<Volume>67</Volume>
<Date>1957</Date>
<PageRange>1--4</PageRange>
<StartPageNumber>1</StartPageNumber>
<EndPageNumber>4</EndPageNumber>
<Authors>[...] </Authors>
<Contributors>
<Contributor>
<ContributorName>BioStor</ContributorName>
</Contributor>
</Contributors>
<Subjects />
<Identifiers>
<PartIdentifier>
<IdentifierName>BioStor</IdentifierName>
<IdentifierValue>4443</IdentifierValue>
</PartIdentifier>
<PartIdentifier>
<IdentifierName>ISSN</IdentifierName>
<IdentifierValue>0006-9698</IdentifierValue>
</PartIdentifier>
</Identifiers>
<Pages>[...] </Pages>
<RelatedParts />
</Result>
</Response>

Additionally, there will be two additions to the Item metadata.

The new data elements are: RightsHolder and ScanningInstitution.
These will optionally be displayed if there is data for the relevant organizations.


<Response>
<Status>ok</Status>
<Result>
<ItemID>59382</ItemID>
<PrimaryTitleID>20770</PrimaryTitleID>
<ThumbnailPageID>17605914</ThumbnailPageID>
<Source>Internet Archive</Source>
<SourceIdentifier>bulletin5160hatc</SourceIdentifier>
<Volume>v.51-60 1898-99</Volume>
<Year/>
<Contributor>
UMass Amherst Libraries (archive.org)
</Contributor>
<RightsHolder>
Biodiversity Heritage Library
</RightsHolder>
<ScanningInstitution>
Smithsonian Institution Libraries
</ScanningInstitution>
<Sponsor>UMass Amherst Libraries</Sponsor>
[...]
</Result>
</Response>
Detailed documentation for the BHL APIs is available at http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/api2/docs/docs.html.  It will be updated to reflect these changes after they are moved into production on 25 July 2016.

Go to http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/getapikey.aspx to get an API key for BHL.

Information about other BHL developer tools can be found at http://biodivlib.wikispaces.com/Developer+Tools+and+API.

If you have questions, please feel free to submit feedback via this form.

BHL at the Society for the Preservation of Natural History Collections

$
0
0
The 31st Annual Meeting of the Society for the Preservation of Natural History Collections (SPNHC) (http://www.spnhc2016.berlin/) was jointly hosted by the Museum für Naturkunde Berlin and the Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum in Berlin, 20-25 June 2016. The SPNHC conference brings together representatives from natural history museums, universities, and biodiversity data aggregators and serves as a wonderful opportunity for BHL to connect with formal partner institutions, collaborators such as GBIF, as well as many BHL users.

As part of the Technical Sessions on 23 June, Dr. Jiří Frank (Scientific Secretary, Národní Muzeum, Prague) and Carolyn Sheffield (BHL Program Manager) co-presented on BHL and its intersections with natural history collections and other biodiversity data aggregators. The talk, entitled Harnessing biodiversity literature for Natural History collections curation and research--a digital library perspective, attracted approximately 100 attendees, most of whom indicated they were familiar with BHL and more than half indicated they use it on a regular basis. The presentation was framed by the perspective of Národní Muzeum, BHL’s long time collaborator and newest Affiliate partner, and included an overview of the BHL consortium structure and some of the services integrated into the BHL website. Highlights included examples of how BHL data intersects with other resources such as EOL, DPLA, and GBIF. The talk concluded with a brief summary of goals for future collaborations, notably via recent initiatives amongst Národní Muzeum  and other European partners.







Unravelling the secrets of Australian native bees

$
0
0
By Dr. Anne Dollin
Co-founder of the Australian Native Bee Research Centre 
North Richmond NSW Australia

Australia has over 1,600 species of native bees. As a young university student in 1979, I was keen to learn all I could about these diverse species. However, I soon found that the original descriptions of many of these bees were in obscure books and journals dating from the late 1700s to the early 1900s, only available in specialised research libraries. Unravelling the secrets of Australian native bees would prove to be a challenge!

Anne Dollin studying the Austroplebeia bees in the Australian National Insect Collection, Canberra. (Photo by Les Dollin)
When naturalist Joseph Banks arrived in Australia in 1770 with the first British expedition, he found an astounding new world of undescribed species. Amongst the hundreds of specimens that he collected were a blue-banded bee, a resin bee, a carpenter bee and a wasp-mimic bee. Five years later the Danish entomologist Johan Christian Fabricius included descriptions of these four bees in his 1775 tome, Systema entomologiae. These were the first recorded descriptions of Australian native bees. You might say that Systema entomologiae was the first field guide to Australian native bees!

To study Systema entomologiae back in my early career, I had to visit the research library of the Australian Museum. This is rare book so it was gingerly placed on a cushion, and I had to handle it with gloves. Photocopying was forbidden, and I had to laboriously copy down the Latin descriptions using pencil and paper. Now, thanks to BHL, I can view Systema entomologiae on my home computer and have downloaded a copy for detailed study (REF 1).

The title page of Johan Fabricius' 1775 Systema entomologiae, the book containing the earliest published descriptions of Australian native bees. Digitized by NCSU Libraries.

As the young Australian nation developed, most of the research on our bees was done by scientists from overseas. In 1854, British entomologist, Frederick Smith, described our first stingless bee species, Tetragonula carbonaria (originally in the genus Trigona), from a specimen deposited in the British Museum. He simply recorded the collection locality of this bee as 'Australia'. Smith's description can be studied in BHL (REF 2).

Then in 1863, Smith examined a nest that had been brought all the way to England and exhibited to the Entomological Society of London. His description, in the Transactions of that society, now archived by BHL, was possibly the first published account of the nest of this species (REF 3).

In 1898, German entomologist, Heinrich Friese, published descriptions of four more stingless bee species from Australia and New Guinea, including the first Austroplebeia species. His paper in Természetrajzi Füzetek is now available from BHL (REF 4).

The title page of the 1898 issue of Természetrajzi Füzetek, containing descriptions of four new stingless bee species from Australia and New Guinea, in a paper by Heinrich Friese. Digitized by Smithsonian Libraries.

In the early 1900s, the American zoologist, Theodore Cockerell, described hundreds of Australian native bee species, including six species of stingless bees. Then finally in the 1930s, Tarlton Rayment, an Australian naturalist, wrote numerous illustrated articles about our native bees. Many of the works of Cockerell and Rayment have also been archived by BHL.

Australia's Tetragonula and Austroplebeia stingless bee species quickly became my special interest. These charming bees were being kept in logs and hives across the continent, they make delicious tangy honey called Sugarbag, and their value as crop pollinators was being explored. Despite their popularity and economic value, their taxonomy was in urgent need of revision. The number of Australian species was unknown and the existing species descriptions were grossly inadequate. My husband, Les, and I decided to try to identify and describe all of the Australian stingless bee species. Little did we realise that it would take us 36 years to achieve this goal!

Les Dollin examining a nest of Austroplebeia stingless bees in far north Queensland in 1997. (Photo by Anne Dollin)

Fifteen species names had already been given to our Australian stingless bees by early entomologists. To assess the validity of these names, first we needed to study the type descriptions of these species. Unfortunately, we started this project long before the existence of BHL, and we were obliged to search for these old papers in museum and university libraries – a daunting task. Then began the field work! Les and I set out on expeditions to the most remote parts of Australia and searched for stingless bees in each of the known localities where they had been described.

With the help of Japanese expert, Professor Shôichi Sakagami, we published our revision of the Tetragonula stingless bees in 1997 [REF 5]. The Austroplebeia, however, proved to be far harder to classify. At last, with the help of collaborative studies with the University of Western Sydney, the species groups became clearer. We then performed a three year, in-depth analysis of our entire Austroplebeia collection and published our Austroplebeia stingless bee revision with Dr Claus Rasmussen in 2015 [REF 6].  For a colourful look at our findings, including stories from our outback expeditions, read 'Meet the Austroplebeia species', article 25 in Aussie Bee Online on Aussie Bee website [REF 7].

The queen and workers of the colourful Austroplebeia cincta stingless bee species found in northern Australia. The original description of this species, written in Latin, can be found in Friese's 1898 paper in Természetrajzi Füzetek, archived in BHL. (Photo by Anne Dollin)

BHL provided valuable assistance with our recent Austroplebeia revision. One of the most challenging tasks was matching the original type specimen of each described species with our recently collected materials. To do this, it was important to find out where each type specimen had been collected. For some type specimens the collection localities were quite vague. For instance, the recorded locality for the A. australis type was 'Central Australia', a huge area covering hundreds of square kilometres. So we searched exhaustively for clues in other old texts from the time, such as the 1891 account by Reverend Louis Schulze on Aboriginals of the Finke River area of Central Australia, archived by BHL [REF 8].  We concluded that the A. australis type was probably collected near the Central Australian Aboriginal mission of Hermannsburg.

The anatomical terminology required for the revision paper was another substantial challenge. I had to compile my own specialised glossary of stingless bee anatomical terms so that I could understand the technical descriptions of the early papers and correctly prepare revised descriptions. BHL provided valuable reference material for this task, including William Kirby's 1826 glossary of anatomical terms [REF 9].

A page from William Kirby's 1826 glossary, listing some of the many technical terms for colours used in species descriptions. Digitized by NCSU Libraries.

I am an independent self-funded researcher located over 80km from the nearest major research library that holds archival material of this type. Being able to browse, study and download these publications on my own computer in my research centre whenever I needed them, rather than travel long distances to a library, greatly facilitated my work.

In addition to our taxonomic work, Les and I have also created Aussie Bee, Australia's largest website on native bees. The photographs, videos and articles presented on Aussie Bee showcase Australian native bees and help raise public awareness of these vital pollinators. The stories of early exploration and discovery connected with our Australian native bees help engage and maintain public interest in these species. We thank BHL for the fascinating material that we have found in their archives so far and look forward to exploring BHL's archives further as we continue to unravel the secrets of Australian native bees.

REFERENCES

______________________________________

This post may contain the personal opinions of BHL users or affiliated staff and does not necessarily represent the official Biodiversity Heritage Library (BHL) position on these matters.

April showers bring...new in-copyright content to BHL!

$
0
0
April, May, and June were busy months for processing license agreements and adding new in-copyright titles: 35 in all, bringing our total to 56 for the first half of 2016! Many licensors outside the BHL Consortium gave permission for their content, which adds contemporary scholarship to the collection already rich in legacy literature.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Below is the full list of in-copyright titles added between April 1st and June 30th, 2016. We thank the individuals and organizations who so generously gave BHL permission to make them available under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license:

  1. Ohio Coleopterist Society
    1. Ohio Beetles Bulletin (2009--)
  2. Wim Vader and fellow editors
    1. Amphipod Newsletter(1972--)
  3. Maryland Ornithological Society
    1. Field List of the Birds of Maryland (3rd. Ed.)
    2. Maryland Birdlife(1945--)
    3. The Yellowthroat (1980--)
  4. Mantis Study Group
    1. Mantis Study Group Newsletter(1996-2007)
  5. Phasmid Study Group
    1. Phasmid Studies(1992--)
  6. Mary Bamas Pomeroy
    1. Favorite Wildflowers of the West Coast
  7. New York Entomological Society
    1. Bulletin of the Brooklyn Entomological Society(1923-1965)
    2. Entomologica Americana(1926-1975)
    3. Journal of the New York Entomological Society(1923-1999)
  8. Western Carolina Botanical Club
    1. Shortia(1979--)
  9. Southern California Botanists
    1. A Flora of the Santa Rosa Plateau, Southern California 
    2. Crossosoma(1975--)
    3. Endangered Plant Communities of Southern California
    4. Flora and Ecology of the Santa Monica Mountains (1st and 2nd Eds.)
    5. Leaflets (1992--)
    6. SCB News (1973-1991)
  10. Arkansas Native Plant Society
    1. Claytonia(1981--)
  11. Pacific Seabird Group
    1. Pacific Seabird Group Bulletin(1974-1993)
    2. Pacific Seabirds (1994--)
  12. Arnold Arboretum at Harvard University
    1. Bulletin of Popular Information (1911-1939)
    2. Arnoldia (1940--)
  13. Wildlife Conservation Society
    1. Zoologica(1907-1973)
  14. Micropalaeontological Society
    1. A Stereo-Atlas of Ostracod Shells(1973-1999)
  15. Delaware Native Plant Society
    1. The Turk's Cap (1998--)
  16. Tennessee Ornithological Society
    1. The Migrant (1930--)
    2. The Tennessee Warbler(2000--)
  17. Wilson Ornithological Society
    1. The Wilson Bulletin (1894-2005)
    2. The Wilson Journal of Ornithology (2006--)
  18. Queensland Museum
    1. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum(1912--)
  19. Royal Botanic Gardens Victoria
    1. Muelleria: An Australian Journal of Botany(1995--)
  20. Illinois Ornithological Society
    1. Meadowlark (1992--)
  21. Northern California Botanists
    1. Botanical Leaflets (2007--)
As in the previous quarter, most of the new titles are the result of the Expanding Access to Biodiversity Literature (EABL) project. EABL solicits print and digital materials from content providers across the United States, including small organizations with unique publications that reflect their niche research areas.

If you would like more information about how copyright information is displayed in BHL and how in-copyright content may be used, see the Licensing and Copyright page on the BHL wiki; for information about how to contribute in-copyright content and the complete list of in-copyright titles that BHL has secured permission for to date, see the Permissions page.

As always, check the blog and follow BHL on Facebook and Twitter (@BioDivLibrary) for updates on new content!

The Pennsylvania Horticultural Society

$
0
0
The Pennsylvania Horticultural Society (PHS) is a nonprofit organization based in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, that offers a variety of gardening programs and activities to its members as well as the surrounding city and state. Its annual Philadelphia Flower Show is the largest and longest-running event of its kind, attracting florists, gardeners, and landscape designers from all over the world. The PHS has also produced many publications over the years, some of which are now available in BHL through the IMLS grant Expanding Access to Biodiversity Literature (EABL).

History of the PHS


Founded in 1827 with 80 members, the PHS provided a forum for serious growers interested in horticulture and its various applications, commercial and academic. At monthly meetings, members exhibited rare or unusual plants, discussed innovations in horticulture, tasted wine, and distributed among themselves cuttings and grafts of plants from all over the U.S. The PHS began a small library in 1828, and the following year held its first annual Philadelphia Flower Show. 

The Franklin Institute on South Seventh Street, site of the PHS's first meeting (from James Boyd's A History of the Pennsylvania Horticultural Society 1827-1927)
Over the next several decades, many prominent seedsmen--some of them PHS members--exhibited at the Philadelphia Flower Show, including Henry Dreer, Robert Buist, Josiah Coates, and David Landreth. These men owned successful nurseries, and many of their catalogs can be found in BHL's Seed & Nursery Catalogs collection.

By 1842, the PHS library contained 450 volumes. It was expanded, and a librarian hired at a salary of $50 per year. By 1850, the library had doubled in size, becoming one of the largest horticultural collections in the country. In 1854, it narrowly avoided destruction in a fire that claimed the Philadelphia Museum. 

Around this time, the PHS began making recommendation to the Philadelphia City Council on which trees to eliminate and which to cultivate in public parks. This marked the beginning of PHS's longstanding efforts to bring gardening to urban spaces, efforts which continued in the decade preceding the Civil War, despite a decline in the Society's membership and finances. 

While its finances were still precarious after the Civil War, the PHS enjoyed increased membership, and in 1867 built its first Horticultural Hall. The more famous Horticultural Hall was built in Fairmount Park for the Centennial Exposition of 1876; PHS members actively contributed to the planning and execution of the Centennial, and the event afforded its members the opportunity to display their fruits and flowers. After the Centennial, PHS held its annual flower show in the new hall. The original hall was damaged in a fire in early 1881 and rebuilt later that year; it was completely destroyed by a second fire in 1893. A third hall was built in 1896, which was sold in 1917 in a time of financial hardship.

Interior of the first Horticultural Hall (from James Boyd's A History of the Pennsylvania Horticultural Society 1827-1927)

The 20th century saw the PHS shift to a predominantly amateur membership, which continued to grow with each passing decade. During World War 2, its members were involved in the movement to plant "victory gardens" which could sustain families during a time of scarcity. Writing in the 1945 Yearbook of the Pennsylvania Horticultural Society, the Report of the President for the previous year asserted:

I feel we should all take pride in the condition of the Society, especially in the face of the changing economic conditions that have been brought about by the war. A planned economy, with all of its regimentation, has been forced upon us for the duration of the Second World War, and the end is not yet. Our important duty has been to keep alive human interest in the work of our Creator as we find it in plant life, which is the very sustenance of our existence. Horticulture, in truth, is refined from agriculture to fit the home and becomes the basis of its economy, from which our community and national economy and life are but mammoth developments. 

By the second half of the 20th century, the amateur-oriented activities of the PHS were clearly reflected in its publications, such as a members' newsletter that offered gardening tips, brief articles, and book recommendations. Meanwhile, the Philadelphia Flower Show continued to grow in size and prominence.

"Lawn Mowers Can Be Dangerous" from the PHS News, v.1 no.6 (1960)

The PHS Today


Currently, the PHS boasts a membership of 27,000. The Philadelphia Flower Show continues to be a major event every year, and in keeping with its early activities, the PHS remains heavily involved in creating civic landscapes, improving public parks, and planting community gardens in Philadelphia.

An exhibit at the 1997 Philadelphia Flower Show

The PHS McLean Library contains 15,000 volumes and is working to digitize many historic, public domain horticultural works as well as PHS publications. It has given BHL permission to add many of these to its own collection (where they will appear soon!), including: 
  • Yearbook of the Pennsylvania Horticultural Society (1925-1998)
  • PHS News (v.1-38, 1960-1997)
  • Philadelphia Spring Flower Show (1966-1997) [title varies]
  • Pennsylvania Gardens (v.1-4 (1937)
  • From Seed to Flower: Philadelphia 1681-1876 (1976)
  • Bulletin of the Pennsylvania Horticultural Society (v.1, nos.1-2 (1923))
  • The Green Scene (v.1-42, 1972-2014)
  • A History of the Pennsylvania Horticultural Society, 1827-1927 (1929)
  • America’s Garden Legacy: A Taste for Pleasure (1978)
Janet Evans, Associate Director of the McLean Library, says, "We made a commitment...to contribute to digitization of horticultural material. I think it’s particularly important in horticulture, because so many of the older serials have never been well indexed, and yet they contain information that is of value to researchers today – historians, biographers, academics in the humanities as well as horticulturists." 

We are grateful to the PHS for their commitment to open access and their efforts to promote horticulture in Pennsylvania and across the world!



BHL paper delivered at 8th Shanghai International Library Forum in Shanghai

$
0
0
I had the honor of delivering an invited paper to the 8th Shanghai International Library Forum in Shanghai, China, 8 July 2016. The paper, Enabling Progress in Global Biodiversity Research: The Biodiversity Heritage Library, co-authored with Constance Rinaldo (Mayr Library, Harvard Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University and BHL Vice-Chair) covered BHL's growth from a project to a cornerstone of biodiversity infrastructure, where sustainability, appropriate expansion, and collaboration with national and pan-national digital libraries (Europeana, the Digital Public Library of America) became more important. With significant contributions relevant throughout the world, the BHL is integral to key databases and data aggregators (e.g. Tropicos, Global Biodiversity Information Facility, the Encyclopedia of Life), and has engaged the research community in tool development and content reuse. The paper was published in Libraries: Enabling Progress, The Proceedings of the Eighth Shanghai International Library Forum. Shanghai Scientific and Technological Literature Press, Shanghai, 2016, pp. 406-418.

IMG_20160706_122214IMG_20160706_112303IMG_20160707_121649


About the Forum:

It is organized by the Shanghai Library (Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of Shanghai) and co-organized by the Shanghai Society for Library Science and the Shanghai Society for Scientific & Technical Information. At this year's event, approximately 300 delegates from 27 countries attended.

#SILF2016 Getting ready to get underway here at the Shanghai LibraryIMG_20160707_090732IMG_20160707_093207


The theme of the forum is "Libraries: Enabling Progress". The conference focused on hot issues and topics, the latest research achievements, innovative ideas, advanced technology and the latest developments related to the theme. It included in-depth and extensive academic discussions. Well-known experts and scholars were invited to present keynote speeches and thematic reports. To ensure the academic quality of this forum and attract more submissions, scholars of library and information science, managers of libraries and information agencies, and professionals from all fields at home and abroad were invited to submit papers and attend the conference.

IMG_20160707_121649IMG_20160707_174438IMG_20160707_175040


After opening congratulatory speeches by national and local politicians, the program began with a series of plenary sessions:
  • Libraries: A Call to Action. Donna SCHEEDER, IFLA President
  • Change and Innovation: Reflection on the Future Development of Librarianship in China. HAN Yongjin, Director, National Library of China
  • The Library and Cultural Transmission by YU Qiuyu, Chairman, Shanghai Library Council, China
Yu's talk was a highlight. A famous Chinese cultural scholar, theorist, cultural historian and writer, he discussed the key role of the library concept in the transmission and preservation of culture.

IMG_20160707_104017
Qiuyu Yu
A second plenary session was chaired by Ai Cheng TAY, Deputy Chief Executive, National Library Board, Singapore and include the following talks:
  • Fiat Lux (Let there be Light!): a Vision for Re-imagining McGill Library Space for 2050. C. Colleen COOK, Trenholme Dean of Libraries, School of Information Science at McGill University in Montreal, Canada
  • New Digital Tools of the Jalisco Public Library as Mobile App, Renewal of Website and Intranet. Juan Manuel DURÁN JUÁREZ, Director, Public Library of Jalisco State, Mexico

IMG_20160707_153516IMG_20160707_160815IMG_20160707_140445

The BHL presentation followed on the second full day of the Forum and was well received by the audience.

IMG_20160708_103155


Marc GILBERT, Lyon Municipal Library, France, introducing the session (above)

Celebrating the Birds of South America

$
0
0
By Gretchen Rings 
Reference & Interlibrary Loan Librarian 
Gantz Family Collections Center, Science & Education 
The Field Museum

Plate 31: Le Cotinga pacapaca, male. Le Vaillant, François. Histoire naturelle d'une partie d'oiseaux nouveaux et rares de l'Amerique et des Indes. 1801. Digitized by The Field Museum of Natural History Library. http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/47511750. Description on pages 66-69.
In honor of the first Olympics to take place in Brazil, we are highlighting a book contributed by The Field Museum featuring birds of South America, Le Vaillant’s Histoire naturelle d'une partie d'oiseaux nouveaux et rares de l'Amerique et des Indes (1801). Among several titles chosen for digitization from the Field Museum Library’s impressive Edward E. Ayer Ornithological Library, housed in the collections of the Mary W. Runnells Rare Book Room, the entry for the volume in Catalogue of the Edward E. Ayer Ornithological Library characterizes it as “a work intended to supplement his Hist. Nat. des Oiseaux d’Afrique (q.v.) by describing and figuring birds not properly included in that work.”

Published in eight parts, Histoire naturelle d'une partie d'oiseaux nouveaux et rares de l'Amerique et des Indes was available as a folio with both colored and uncolored plates; large quarto with colored plates only; and quarto, with uncolored plates only. Originally 240 plates were proposed, but ultimately only 49 were produced of species of Bucerotidae from Malay Archipelago and Cotingidae from South America. The Field Museum’s copy is a folio with both colored and uncolored plates.

Plate 37, color: Le Continga ouette, male. Le Vaillant, François. Histoire naturelle d'une partie d'oiseaux nouveaux et rares de l'Amerique et des Indes. 1801. Digitized by The Field Museum of Natural History Library. http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/47511812. Descriptions on pages 81-83.

Plate 38, uncolored: Le Continga ouette, male. Le Vaillant, François. Histoire naturelle d'une partie d'oiseaux nouveaux et rares de l'Amerique et des Indes. 1801. Digitized by The Field Museum of Natural History Library. http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/47511816. Description on pages 81-83.

Born to French naturalists in Paramaribo, Dutch Guiana (Suriname), François Le Vaillant (1753-1824) began collecting bird specimens and building his own “cabinet” (or collection of specimens) before the age of ten. The family returned to France in 1763, where Le Vaillant would eventually make connections with ornithologists, collectors, and patrons who would become supporters of his work.

Le Vaillant was one of the first naturalists to independently embark on long voyages to study subjects in the wild. Previous naturalists had generally conducted such fieldwork as part of larger scientific expeditions. Not an illustrator in his own right, Le Vaillant relied on renowned artist Jacques Barraband (1768-1890) and emerging technologies of the day to produce his books. As authors Sitwell and Buchanan point out: “One interesting and sometimes confusing point is that some famous books are known by the author’s name and not the artist. Le Vaillant...whose name appears on most of the great French bird books of that same period, was a naturalist who travelled far, but never drew any of the pictures for his books…”

Barraband painted the birds that Le Vaillant secured on his voyages in watercolors, which were then assembled using an “elaborate mixture of processes - engraving, etching, colour printing and hand-finishing” (Lambourne). Le Vaillant was fortunate in that Napoléon Bonaparte had imitated a policy of Louis XIV to create a series of publications that were then “sent as presents to crowned heads, men of science, and learned bodies, in evidence of the splendours of the Empire...in this manner many glorious books came into being...The works of Le Vaillant owe their sumptuous character to the same impetus” (Sitwell and Buchanan).

Le Vaillant’s travel memoirs contributed as much to his fame in his lifetime as his illustrated bird books: due to its popularity, Travels into the interior parts of Africa : by the way of the Cape of Good Hope in the years 1780, 8l, 82, 83, 84, and 85 (contributed by Smithsonian Libraries) was translated into English and German. Feeling pressured to write a sequel, New travels into the interior parts of Africa : by the way of the Cape of Good Hope, in the years 1783, 84 and 85 (also contributed by Smithsonian Libraries), contains “an entirely fabricated account of a journey from the Orange River to the Tropic of Capricorn,” though this was not discovered until after his death (Pasquier and Farrand). Ultimately, despite any embellishments, Le Vaillant will be remembered for having produced some of the finest bird books ever created.

Map, Foldout: Map of M. Le Vaillant’s Two Journies in the Southern Part of Africa. New travels into the interior parts of Africa : by the way of the Cape of Good Hope, in the years 1783, 84 and 85. Digitized by The Smithsonian Libraries. http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/47139301.

The images from Histoire naturelle d'une partie d'oiseaux nouveaux et rares de l'Amerique et des Indes are available in BHL's Flickr. Nearly all of them have been taxon tagged by volunteers with the scientific name of the species depicted, allowing you to easily determine the species in the image as well as search Flickr for one of the included species and find the image. Learn more about our citizen science Flickr tagging efforts.

Example of a taxon-tagged image from La Vaillant's Histoire naturelle d'une partie d'oiseaux nouveaux et rares de l'Amerique et des Indes in BHL's Flickr


References: 

  • Elphick, Jonathan. (2004). Birds. London: Scriptum Editions.
  • Lambourne, Maureen. (1990). The Art of Bird Illustration. London: Collins. 
  • Martin, H. Bradley. (1989). The Library of H. Bradley Martin : Magnificent Color-Plate Ornithology. Sotheby’s Catalogue of Sale. New York, NY: Sotheby’s. 
  • Pasquier, Roger F. and John Farrand. (1991). Masterpieces of Bird Art: 700 Years of Ornithological Illustration. New York: Abbeville Press. 
  • Sitwell, Sacheverell, Handasyde Buchanan, and James Fisher. (1990). Fine Bird Books: 1700-1900. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press. 
  • Stresemann, Erwin and G. William Cottrell. (1975). Ornithology from Aristotle to the Present. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

National Digital Stewardship Residency (NDSR) Job Postings

$
0
0
We're hiring!

The vacancies for the five National Digital Stewardship Residency (NDSR) cohort positions have been posted through Harvard University. These five residents will work on projects related to the Biodiversity Heritage Library at BHL partner institutions in Cambridge, MA, Washington, DC, Chicago, IL, St. Louis , MO or Los Angeles, CA from January 2017 to December 2017. Learn more about the NDSR program, funded by the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) as part of the Laura Bush 21st Century Librarian Program.

For more information, visit the vacancies posting page here. To apply, click here.

Qualification requirements and information about each of the five projects (as provided on the Harvard University posting page above) are listed below. Residents will each be assigned one of the five available projects and corresponding host institution(s). Applicants should specify their top three choices of institutions and projects from the list below in the cover letter included in their application. Application review will begin immediately and will continue until the positions are filled.

WHO MAY APPLY: 

Applicants must be U. S. citizens who have graduated from an accredited degree-granting Master’s or Doctoral program between Summer 2014 and January 2017. Applicants must be US citizens or permanent residents.

QUALIFICATIONS REQUIRED: 

  • Possess a master or doctoral degree with graduation between spring 2014 and January 2017 in one of the following fields (or other discipline engaged in the stewardship of digital materials): 
    • Library Science 
    • Information Science 
    • Archival Science 
    • Records Management 
    • Computer Sciences 
    • Museum Studies 
    • Art History 
    • Engineering 
    • Digital Media 
    • Master of Fine Arts in New Media 
  • Must be available to work on-site for the entire one-year period (relocation expenses are not offered). 
  • Must be a US citizen or permanent resident.

AVAILABLE PROJECTS:

Content Analysis. 
This project will be an analysis of the quantity of literature underpinning the field of biodiversity, the amount of that literature in the public domain, the representation of each discipline (delineated by taxon group) within BHL, an exploration of methodologies to scope the collections, and areas where BHL may target development to better serve the research population. Host: BHL Chicago partners (The Field Museum of Natural History and the Chicago Botanic Garden) with mentors Library Directors Christine Giannoni and Leora Siegel.

Import of Crowdsourced Data Corrections and Enhancements. 
Building on the IMLS grant received by the Missouri Botanical Garden, Purposeful Gaming and BHL, in which BHL worked with Mary Flannagan and Tiltfactor , the mentors for this project will work with the resident to develop methodologies and propose tools for integration of crowdsourced data corrections and enhancements back into the BHL portal. Best practices will be documented for verification, trust, and multi-tier review. Host: Harvard University: MCZ, mentors Library Managers Constance Rinaldo and Joseph deVeer.

Enabling image discovery within the Biodiversity Heritage Library. 
Building on the successful NEH Art of Life grant, crowdsourced metadata around BHL images hosted on Flickr and Zooniverse would be integrated back into the BHL through user interface modifications to the BHL portal to enable image searching, browsing and display. The resident will work with the BHL technical team to propose best practices for integration of this data into BHL as well as sustainable methodologies for augmenting image tagging for BHL content. Host: Missouri Botanical Garden (MOBOT), mentors Library Director Douglas Holland and Data Projects Coordinator, Trish Rose-Sandler.

Digital Library Best Practices Analysis. 
The mentor will work with the resident to consult with BHL partners such as DPLA and Europeana to determine how BHL data works in these large scale national and pan-national digital libraries. The resident will propose analyses of other large-scale digital libraries (HathiTrust, the Internet Archive, National Digital Library of New Zealand, Trove, for example) to categorize high value tools and services that can be built into the next version of BHL or developed with existing APIs from partners. Host: Los Angeles County Natural History Museum, mentor Chief Librarian and Curator Richard Hulser. NHM Research Library.

User Needs and Usability Analysis. 
The mentor will work with the resident to identify members of the larger taxonomic and biodiversity informatics community to determine user needs and services for providing increased value to BHL content. Building on a ten year relationship with this community, BHL staff will introduce the resident to relevant initiatives hosted at the Smithsonian, such as Consortium for the Barcode of Life (CBoL) and Encyclopedia of Life (EOL) and to partners such as Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). The resident will analyze input gathered to define recommendations and requirements for expanding the BHL digital library functionality. Host: BHL Secretariat/Smithsonian Libraries, mentor Carolyn Sheffield, BHL Program Manager.

Renard's Book of Fantastical Fish

$
0
0
Renard, Louis. Poissons, ecrevisses et crabes. 1754. Digitized by the Ernst Mayr Library, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University. http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/50095135.

You may not recognize all (or even many) of the East Indian marine species portrayed in the first known book on fish to be published in color. Don't worry. It's not a lack of ichthyological proficiency on your part. Rather, it's because all of the species depicted in Louis Renard's Poissons, ecrevisses et crabes received some level of artistic embellishment - and approximately 9% are completely fantastical.

If that's not strange enough, the work is produced by a man who identified himself as a "secret agent on behalf of the British Crown" and contains a portrait of a mermaid.

Renard, Louis. Poissons, ecrevisses et crabes. 1754. Digitized by the Ernst Mayr Library, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University. http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/50095087.

These facts might lead you to conclude that Poissons, ecrevisses et crabes, de diverses couleurs et figures extraordinaires, que l'on trouve autour des isles Moluques et sur les côtes des terres Australes has little scientific value. But in that assumption, you'd be wrong.

Besides being the first published book in color about fish, in a 2012 article published in Natural Histories, Mai Reitmeyer, Research Services Librarian at the American Museum of Natural History, writes that this work is "an important part of the scientific literature of the eighteenth century, the new Age of Enlightenment" (Reitmeyer, 33).

According to Theodore W. Pietsch, an ichthyologist who conducted an examination of the title in the late twentieth century and whom Reitmeyer quotes in her article, Renard's publication "gives us an intriguing glimpse of what science was like in the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries" and thus "to cast the work off as being without scientific merit is to greatly underestimate its value" (Reitmeyer, 34). What's more, since the waters surrounding Ambon Island in Indonesia, where many of the depicted species were found, is now a heavily polluted ecosystem, it's likely that the biodiversity in the area has changed since Renard's publication. Thus, the fauna depicted in Poissons, ecrevisses et crabes, around 90% of which, according to Pietsch, can be identified down to the species, genus, or family level, can offer an important historical perspective on marine diversity in the region (Barley, 2010).

Renard, Louis. Poissons, ecrevisses et crabes. 1754. Digitized by the Ernst Mayr Library, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University. http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/50095031.

As Reitmeyer recounts in her article, Renard was born in France sometime around 1678 but, to escape religious persecution, immigrated to the Netherlands with his family around the turn of the century and eventually became a citizen of Amsterdam. Encouraged by his father-in-law, Renard became a book dealer and publisher and, in 1718 or 1719, produced the first volume of the first edition of his most famous work, Poissons, ecrevisses et crabes, the full title of which translates to "Fishes, crayfishes and crabs, of diverse colors and extraordinary forms, which are found around the islands of the Moluccan and on the coasts of southern lands."

While the work may depict over 450 fish and crustacean species from the East Indies, Renard published the work without ever leaving the Netherlands. Instead, he copied drawings by other artists to create the 100 plates, representing 460 hand-colored copper engravings, for his publication.

Renard, Louis. Poissons, ecrevisses et crabes. 1754. Digitized by the Ernst Mayr Library, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University. http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/50095173.

Dutch artist Samuel Fallours, a soldier stationed in Ambon with the Dutch East India Company, painted a great many of the drawings that Renard copied for this work. During his time in Ambon, Fallours created many drawings of East Indian marine life that later appeared in several eighteenth century publications, including Renard's.

According to Pietsch, Fallours likely included elements of the fantastical in his drawings in order to attract the European collectors who purchased his works (Barley, 2010). These embellishments ranged from artificially bright and randomly applied colors to total fabrications, including a portrait of a mermaid, which also appeared amongst an arrangement of exotic East Indian biodiversity published in Francois Valentijn's Oud en Nieuw Oost-Indien (1724−1726).

Portrait of a mermaid by Samuel Fallours. Renard, Louis. Poissons, ecrevisses et crabes. 1754. Digitized by the Ernst Mayr Library, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University. http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/50095192.

Poissons, ecrevisses et crabeswas published in three different editions. Only sixteen copies of the first, published in 1718 or 1719, are known to exist. Thirty-four copies are known of the second edition, published in 1754. The rarest edition, with only six known copies, is the third, published in 1782 but never completed (Reitmeyer, 33).

Thanks to Ernst Mayr Library of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard University, you can view the second edition of Renard's work for free in BHL. And if this article hasn't piqued your curiosity quite enough to click on the link, let's not forget the "secret agent" aspect mentioned earlier!

In what was likely a marketing ploy to boost sales, the dedication statement within Poissons, ecrevisses et crabesidentifies Renard as a "secret agent on behalf of the British Crown." What's the story behind this claim? According to Reitmeyer, Renard was employed by George I and George II to search "ships leaving Amsterdam to prevent arms from reaching James Stuart, the Roman Catholic 'Old Pretender' to the British throne" (Reitmeyer, 33).

Fantasy, intrigue, and science. What's not to love about Poissons, ecrevisses et crabes?

Renard, Louis. Poissons, ecrevisses et crabes. 1754. Digitized by the Ernst Mayr Library, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University. http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/50095181.

You can view the images from this work in Flickr. You can also find products featuring images from this title in our CafePress store. 100% of the proceeds will be used to digitize more books for BHL. Start shopping today!

Selection of products in the BHL CafePress featuring images from Renard's Poissons, ecrevisses et crabes.  100% of proceeds will be used to digitize more books for BHL.


REFERENCES


Supporting Historical Paleontological Research

$
0
0
World's first large mounted Camptosaurus skeleton at the National Museum of Natural History. Proceedings of the United States National Museum. v. 41 (1912). Digitized by Smithsonian Libraries. http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/29866417.

In 1911, the Smithsonian Institution debuted the world's first large mounted Camptosaurus skeleton at its newly-opened Natural History building. The display featured two specimens erected side-by-side, one identified as Camptosaurus nanus and the other as Camptosaurus browni.

Camptosaurus, whose name means "flexible lizard," was a plant-eating, beaked dinosaur that lived during the Late Jurassic period. Both Smithsonian specimens were uncovered at a quarry near Como Bluff, Wyoming. The smaller of the specimens, dubbed C. nanus, was collected in 1882 by William Reed as part of a collecting expedition funded by the United States Geological Survey and under the technical direction of famous paleontologist Othniel Charles Marsh.

Marsh is well-renowned for his many contributions to the field of paleontology, which include discovering a plethora of fossil animals and naming a multitude of dinosaur genera including Camptosaurus. He is also notoriously remembered for his longstanding conflict with fellow paleontologist Edward Drinker Cope - a conflict that came to be known as the Bone Wars. The intense rivalry between the two men spanned decades as each undermined, ridiculed, and even sabotaged the work of the other in a struggle for scientific dominance.

The C. nanus fossil was originally accessioned into the collection of the Yale Peabody Natural History Museum, where Marsh was the Curator of Paleontology, until, after Marsh's death in 1899, it was transferred to the Smithsonian in compliance with legislation regarding objects collected for, or whose collection was funded by, the US government. The fossil, which was cataloged as USNM 2210, was then prepared and mounted by Norman H. Boss in 1911 alongside the larger C. browni specimen. The mounts are detailed in a 1912 publication by Charles W. Gilmore. Interestingly, the specimens are now known to represent the juvenile (previously C. nanus) and mature (previously C. browni) stages of a single species, C. disbar.

C. nanus, as mounted at the National Museum of Natural History. Proceedings of the United States National Museum. v. 41 (1912). Digitized by Smithsonian Libraries. http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/29866427.

Between 2004 and 2008, the Camptosaurus fossils were taken off display to allow for repairs and the creation of casts that may be re-exhibited with the reopening of the Smithsonian's Deep Time Hall in 2019. The authentic fossils will be placed in the museum's collections for research and conservation reasons.

The fascinating history of USNM 2210's journey from rock to museum is detailed by National Museum of Natural History (NMNH) volunteer Mark Lay in the article A Brief History of Camptosaurus, U.S. National Museum Specimen 2210.

Mark Lay with Camptosaurus cast at the National Museum of Natural History.

Trained as a physicist and nuclear engineer, Mark began volunteering in the Vertebrate Paleontology Preparation Lab at NMNH in 2007 after retirement provided him more time to pursue personal interests like paleontology.

Mark's early volunteer activities in the Preparation Lab involved making molds and casts, primarily of USNM 2210. Since then, after moving to work with Department of Paleobiology Information Officer Tom Jorstad, he has transitioned to providing research support for requests from the public and outside researchers, as well as organizing and developing “who, what, when, where” metadata for paleontology-related photographic images in both Department and Smithsonian Institution Archives files. He also writes articles on various aspects of the Department's history and currently is researching the first 100 years of vertebrate fossil preparation in the Smithsonian.

The Biodiversity Heritage Library has proven to be an important resource for Mark's research, providing information both about items in the collection and historical documents regarding the history of the NMNH and other natural history museums around the US.

"I am a big fan of BHL," lauds Mark, who uses BHL up to 4-5 times a week. "I am able to spend only roughly one day per week in the NMNH. This means I can spend only a limited amount of time examining actual hard copy documents in the museum libraries. The fact that I can access many of the same documents via BHL means that I can also work from home – greatly increasing the amount of time that I can devote to my volunteer research. In addition, BHL’s inclusion of documents from other museums and universities enables me to access documents that otherwise would be extremely difficult for me to obtain. BHL doesn’t have everything I want, but I would be hard-pressed to do my research without it."

This image, SIA 2011-1418, shows USNM Curator of Vertebrate Paleontology Charles Gilmore’s camp site near North Horn Mountain, Utah during his 1937 expedition. It appears as Figure 1 in Gilmore’s 1938 publication, “Fossil Hunting in Utah and Arizona”, Explorations and Field-work of the Smithsonian Institution in 1937, pp 1-4, available in BHL here: http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/40734134 (Digitized by Smithsonian Libraries).

Currently, Mark is working on a series of glass lantern slides dating from the mid-1890s through the late 1930s, now being digitized by the Archives and possessing limited metadata. BHL has been a valuable resource for obtaining more information about the slides.

"Some of these slide images were originally used in various Smithsonian publications from that era, making positive identification of the people, fossil localities, and dates much easier," explains Mark. "More challenging have been the slides sent to the Smithsonian from a variety of museums around the U.S. So, our identification process has first concentrated on determining an initial 'guesstimate' of the curator, specimen, or collecting locality involved, then backtracking through relevant Smithsonian publications to see if the image appears. If not, we backtrack our guesstimate to publications from other 'most likely' museums. If all that fails, we dig deeper into the view or geology portrayed to see if we can find something similar and broaden the search to include relevant publications from other sources. Having so many of the Smithsonian and other museum publications from that time period in BHL has greatly sped up this process."

Before using BHL, Mark scoured the physical copies of these publications to find this information - a time consuming and sometimes frustrating process. This all changed when Martha Rosen, a librarian in the NMNH Smithsonian Libraries, introduced him to BHL.

"I discovered BHL 5 or 6 years ago when I was sitting in the museum reference collection reading through some old United States National Museum annual reports, and complaining that my eyes were getting ready to drop out from going through so much text all at once," recalls Mark. "Martha mentioned that I could get the documents on-line and gave me the BHL link. I downloaded a searchable PDF of the documents and went through them that evening, actually finding relevant information faster than I could with the hard copy."

This image, SIA 2011-1429, shows Quarry 6 in the Freezeout Mountains of Wyoming, as worked by the Field Columbian Museum expedition of 1899. It was used as Plate XXX in the Field Columbian Reports, Volume 1, October 1899, included in the Annual Report of the Director to the Board of Trustees for the Years 1894-1900, available in BHL here: http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/45723188 (Digitized by Smithsonian Libraries).

Mark's volunteer work with the Smithsonian has allowed him to pursue his passions, enhance collection information, and share wonderful insights into the history of the museum and fossil preparation.

"Paleontology has been a long-standing interest," Mark asserts. "To me, there is a fascination with bringing a fossil out of the rock encasing it and learning more about it. My interest in paleontological history is more recent, but the research has turned out to be no less rewarding."

Mark's articles, published through the Department of Paleobiology's website, provide him a means to share the wonderful knowledge and history he is uncovering. For instance, Mark's Camptosaurus article highlights the sometimes tangled path of a fossil from field to museum and provides insight into the changing philosophy of fossil preparation.

As Mark explains in his article, in the early 1900s, "preparators mounted a specimen and expected it to stay mounted forever – no provision was made for repair or reconstruction." So when preparing USNM 2210 back in 1911, "heavy copper wire and iron strapping were used as a support armature, with thinner copper wire used to secure the manus and pes elements. In general, these supports have held up well, with only slight corrosion damage, but some of the bolts and rivets securing the skeleton were drilled through real bone and secured with glue. As we have dismantled the specimen, this mounting technique has occasionally necessitated our cracking bones in order to remove them from the armature, and then making appropriate repairs."

Modern techniques accommodate the possible future need to dismantle specimens and allow for a more-realistic presentation of specimens. "The hard plaster we have used for the casts allows for support connections to be made through the simulated bone, reducing the amount of armature seen by the public and providing a more natural looking display. The philosophy is to make all changes reversible, while also ensuring repairs are both state of the art and long lasting," explains Mark in his article.

We're excited to see the ways that BHL has helped support Mark's valuable work at the Smithsonian. It's a great example of one of the many ways that BHL inspires discovery through free access to biodiversity knowledge.

__________________________

This post may contain the personal opinions of BHL users or affiliated staff and does not necessarily represent the official Biodiversity Heritage Library (BHL) position on these matters.

The Raptor Research Foundation

$
0
0
This year, the Raptor Research Foundation (RRF) celebrates its 50th year of promoting scientific understanding of birds of prey. Last month, the RRF gave BHL permission to add its newsletter and the first 38 years of its journal to the collectiona wealth of information about hawks, eagles, falcons, owls, and their relativesas part of the Expanding Access to Biodiversity Literature (EABL) project. 


History


Following a precipitous decline in the population of Peregrine Falcons in the mid-1960s, and before the effects of agricultural chemicals like DDT were well understood, experts identified a correlation between the crisis and an increase in cereal farming in Great Britain. A handful of those experts convened to tackle the problem, and thus was born the Raptor Research Foundation in February of 1966. 

In the years since its founding, the RRF has gained a robust international membership and expanded its scope to cover all aspects of raptor science. Writing to commemorate the RRF's 50th anniversary in the March, 2016 issue of the Journal of Raptor Research (v.50, no.1), W. Grainger Huntone of RRF's original membersnotes that the Foundation's early activities all progressed to "a satisfying endpointfrom field biology to chemistry and physiology, from experimentation to population ecology and advocacy, and ultimately, to restoration." He goes on to mention several important contributions of RRF members, including the discovery that the drug diclofenac was responsible for decimating Asian vulture populations. 

Today, the RRF remains at the forefront of raptor conservation, harnessing the power of volunteers to address the myriad threats to raptor populations around the world: its Conservation Committee releases Position Statements that engage, challenge, and influence policymakers; its annual conference is a gathering place for the raptor community to present original research and participate in training workshops; and its publications disseminate the latest findings in raptor science to the broader scientific community. 

Publications


A frame-by-frame capture of a Peregrine Falcon attacking a Bald Eagle, in
 "Field Techniques in a Study of the Behavior of Peregrine Falcons," p.93
by R. Wayne Nelson, Raptor Research v.7 no.3 (1973) 
The journal of the RRF began publication in 1967 as Raptor Research News, which doubled as an organizational newsletter and a vehicle for scholarship. Starting with volume 6 in 1972, the title was shortened to Raptor Research, which reflected its broader scope. It was also organized into three sections: formal, peer-reviewed Scientific Papers; Reports, Reviews, and Opinion, which contained meeting reports, book reviews, and other secondary material receiving less editorial scrutiny; and Notes, News, and Queries, which contained items typically found in a newsletter. 

Beginning with volume 21 in 1987, the journal was renamed The Journal of Raptor Research, its current title. Like the preceding title, it is published quarterly and organized into Research Articles, Short Communications, and Letters, followed by secondary material such as book reviews. Within the next several weeks, The Journal of Raptor Research will be available on BHL through volume 39 (2005). 

The inaugural issue of Wingspan, v.1, no.1 (1992)
In 1992, recognizing the need for a separate publication that was less labor-intensive than the journal and more appropriate for informal news items relevant to the raptor community, the RRF established a newsletter called Wingspan. Wingspan is published twice a year and contains news about Foundation leadership and elections, member profiles, conference summaries, short features about individuals and organizations involved in raptor conservation, and other brief news items. Or, as then-president Richard J. Clark summarized in his introduction to the first issue of Wingspan in 1992, "Journal articles tend to be more about raptors and Newsletter articles about raptor people." Look for additional issues of Wingspan in BHL in the coming weeks.

The EABL staff is grateful to the RRF for so generously allowing its publications to appear in BHL, and we wish them success in their ongoing efforts to promote understanding and conservation of raptors.


A Visual Delight: Natural History Illustrations from BHL on Instagram

$
0
0
BHL is now on Instagram!

Embracing the visually-driven nature of Instagram, our feed focuses on sharing the stunning historic illustrations in BHL's collection. From birds of paradise to boxing kangaroos, charming bookplates, and artworks by some of history's most renowned illustrators, there's a wealth of visual delight waiting for you on our Instagram.

Secretarybird (Sagittarius serpentarius) is a nomadic bird of prey found in the grasslands of sub-Saharan Africa. #SciArt by Louis Agassiz Fuertes in the Album of Abyssinian Birds and Mammals (1930). Contributed by University Library, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. http://ow.ly/V5SQ3035ED9. Posted to Instagram by Michelle Marshall.

Plus, thanks to citizen science taxon tagging activities for BHL's Flickr, the species in each illustration have been conveniently identified in the post description. Translation: you'll always be able to identify what species you're looking at, even if you've never seen it before.

And Flickr taxon tagging isn't the only way that citizen science has benefited our Instagram. The feed itself is curated by BHL citizen scientist Michelle Marshall.

Night-blooming cactus (Hylocereus lemairei). By Walter Hood Fitch. Curtis's Botanical Magazine, Vol. 54 (1827). Contributed by Missouri Botanical Garden. http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/488560. Posted to Instagram by Michelle Marshall.

Michelle first became involved in citizen science through the Smithsonian Transcription Center, which she discovered while looking for ways to volunteer in her free time during her STEM studies. Through those activities, Michelle discovered BHL and our Flickr tagging opportunities. She now focuses on researching taxonomy to add to our images - an activity that she finds deeply rewarding.

"My favorite thing about volunteering for BHL is that I am always learning through research," says Michelle. "I am able to connect with scientists and libraries to learn more, and I know more about biodiversity, geography, and even scientific art than I have ever learned in formal study. Just browsing the images on Flickr leads to new discoveries that I am excited to learn about and share with others on social media."

Michelle first began sharing her finds through her own Twitter account. The posts were so well-received that she decided to create @HistSciArt, devoted specifically to sharing BHL illustrations and her related taxonomic research.

"I knew that BHL has been working on making the images more accessible for everyone, in particular the scientific community, so I thought that creating an account devoted specifically to sharing these images on Twitter would help with that effort," explains Michelle. "Most of the images that I tweet I have researched the taxonomy for, and I try to share more information than just the illustration."

We were so impressed by Michelle's account and the quality of her research and posts that, when she expressed interest in expanding her efforts to Instagram, we invited her to do so by curating an account for BHL.

African Chameleon (Chamaeleo africanus) for #WorldLizardDay. Alfred Edmund Brehm, Brehm's Tierleben, Bd. 2 (1913). Contributed by Ernst Mayr Library, Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard University. http://ow.ly/eX9W303e4bF. Posted to Instagram by Michelle Marshall.

"Instagram is an enormously popular social media platform, so I was truly honored when I was asked to curate BHL’s Instagram account," says Michelle. "Because I believe in the great work that BHL is doing to support science and research, I felt that this would be another way that I could help share the wealth of knowledge in BHL’s collection. The great thing about sharing BHL’s collections on Instagram is that I am able to provide more information about the book and image as well as to connect with more people and institutions. Because I share different content on Instagram, any followers of HistSciArt and BHL on Twitter will have more great works to view and explore."

And it seems people do indeed love exploring BHL illustrations on Instagram (we're not surprised!). BHL's Instagram has grown to over 400 followers in just over two weeks. This success is due not only to the quality of BHL's collections, but also to the caliber of Michelle's research and posts, which not only provide taxonomic and bibliographic information, but also identify the contributing libraries and include timely and engaging hashtags. We've also started posting one of each day's Instagram posts to BHL's Facebook as #BHLDailySciArt.

Gladiolus orphée and Gladiolus horace. Botanical #SciArt by Worthington George Smith. The Floral Magazine, Vol. 9 (1870). Contributed by the LuEsther T. Mertz Library of The New York Botanical Garden. biodiversitylibrary.org/page/50241074. Posted to Instagram by Michelle Marshall.

We're so grateful to Michelle for all of her contributions to help increase awareness of and access to BHL's collections. We believe this partnership is a testament to the power and benefits of citizen science, and with that we also extend a huge thanks to each and every volunteer that dedicates their time and resources to improving BHL collections. You can learn more about all of our citizen science opportunities here.

So, you might be wondering (as we were!), for someone who's explored as many books and researched as many illustrations as Michelle has, which title would she pick as her favorite? It turned out to be an easy question for her to answer.

"When I discovered Catesby's The natural history of Carolina, Florida and the Bahama Islands, I think I literally leapt out of my chair!" exclaims Michelle. "I grew up in Florida and South Carolina, and here was a spectacular natural history work all about the native flora and fauna of my area. Catesby spent lots of time in the Southern Colonies during the 1720s, which is the same time that part of my family came to what was then called Carolina. I like to think that what he saw and experienced was the same as what my ancestors knew. I am so pleased to have access to all three editions of his work through BHL and to have taxon tagged all of them!"

Green tree frog (Hyla cinerea) about to snack on a Green lynx spider (Peucetia viridans) while hanging onto Skunk cabbage (Symplocarpus foetidus). Mark Catesby, The Natural History of Carolina, Florida and the Bahama Islands, Vol.2, 1st Ed. (1743). Contributed by Smithsonian Libraries. http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/40680311. Posted to Instagram by Michelle Marshall.

You can explore the illustrations from all three editions of Catesby's monumental work (it's the first major illustrated publication on the flora and fauna of North America and was chosen by Smithsonian Libraries as their BHL@10 Notable Book Contribution) in Flickr, all of which have been taxon tagged by Michelle.

Be sure to check out more of the beautiful illustrations in our collection by following us on Instagram. A world of art and science (made possible thanks to citizen science) awaits you!

Squirrel Glider (Petaurus norfolcensis). Although it resembles a squirrel, this mammal is a marsupial native to Australia. #SciArt by Henry Constantine Richter and John Gould for Gould's Mammals of Australia, Vol. 1 (1863). Contributed by Smithsonian Libraries. http://ow.ly/e5zj303j4nr. Posted to Instagram by Michelle Marshall.


How's your fern and bird coverage, BHL?

$
0
0
By Becca Greenstein
Smithsonian Libraries Professional Development Intern

“Every one knows what a bird is,” asserts an early 20th century book that I found while browsing the Biodiversity Heritage Library (BHL).

As I’ve learned during my Professional Development Internship with Jacqueline Chapman at Smithsonian Libraries this summer, it’s not always that simple. Taxonomy is ever-changing, especially at the granular level needed by subject specialists around the world who use BHL to conduct research on organisms ranging from mosses to turtles to fungi.

BHL is a consortial digital library whose member libraries digitize works in natural history and botany based on both user requests and subject librarians’ selections. My project for this summer was to refine a collection assessment methodology for BHL using both taxonomic and bibliographic analyses. Along the way, I’ve learned valuable lessons in using library tools, troubleshooting in Python (a computer programming language), and understanding the thought processes of 19th century ornithologists and pteridologists.

Becca Greenstein

Last year, Jacqueline worked with Robin Everly, the Smithsonian’s Botany and Horticulture Librarian, to conduct a taxonomic and bibliographic analysis to assess the depth of the BHL’s fern and lycophyte literature. They presented their results at an international conference on ferns, Next Generation Pteridology, and had the unique ability to talk with many subject-specialist users from around the world. Jacqueline later shared this proof-of-concept with researchers at TDWG in Nairobi, Kenya.

For the bibliographic portion of the project, Fern Books and Related Items in English before 1900 was used to create a list that could be referenced to determine whether a book was available on BHL, and if not, if we had access to it. A year later, I furthered this analysis by seeing what has changed in the past year and making requests for partner libraries to scan items to add to the collection. I enjoyed gathering data for books with titles such as Greenhouse Ferns and the Romance of Plant Life, Rambles in Search of Ferns, and The Fern Paradise: A Plea for the Culture of Ferns (2nd edition in BHL).

As the bibliography used included all editions of a particular work, regardless of whether the content had changed, I decided to not digitize the 53 works on the list whose content was already in BHL in another edition of the same work. As you can see in the graphs below, the number of fern books on BHL from this list has increased by 36% over the past year. The 112 titles from the list that are not yet in BHL but that we have access to via partner libraries will be in BHL after they are digitized. We lack access to only 37 of the titles on the list that would add content to BHL, and it will be interesting to follow up with this study to see if current partners acquire new resources or if new partners that possess these materials join the BHL Consortium.

2015 Bibliographic Analysis: Graph presents percentage of books from the list generated using Fern Books and Related Items in English before 1900 that are in BHL, are not in BHL but are held by a BHL partner, and are neither in BHL nor held by a BHL partner.
2016 Bibliographic Analysis, showing that the BHL collection of fern books has increased from 2015 to 2016. 

For the taxonomic portion of the project, BHL’s coverage of a particular taxonomic grouping using scientific names was analyzed. The digitized material on BHL is in the form of images, which the computer does not recognize as text. Using Optical Character Recognition (OCR), the images are converted to machine-readable text. Taxonomic Name Recognition (TNR) then searches the OCR to find scientific names using multiple recognized lists of scientific names.

To use this powerful analytical tool to analyze BHL’s literature on birds, I upgraded the Python 2 code used for last year’s analysis to Python 3, the newest version of the programming language. Using my code, I counted the number of mentions in BHL of each genus of birds that appear in Catalogue of Life, as determined by TNR, to identify potential gaps in the BHL collection.

Of the 2234 genera analyzed, 99.6% of them are mentioned in the BHL corpus, 131 individual genera had more than 10,000 mentions in BHL, and 88% of them had more than 100 mentions.

I conducted an in-depth analysis of the 37 genera with fewer than ten mentions in BHL to figure out possible reasons for the paucity of literature. I determined that this lack of literature could be attributed to such things as the more-recent description of some of the genera, such as within the past 20 years, to the locality of some genera, as in some birds being endemic to far-away (to 19th century European ornithologists) places like New Guinea and Mozambique, and to taxonomic changes to the genera over the years. I then looked for the first mention of each of the 37 genera in books and journal articles online and in print, in addition to submitting scan requests for the books we have access to that weren’t already in BHL. There was something surreal about trekking up to the Birds Library, which is tucked away on the sixth floor of the National Museum of Natural History, finding Ornithologische Berichte on the shelf (and no, I don’t speak German), and opening to page 118 to find Wilhelm Meise’s initial description of Stresemannia bougainvillea.

Meise’s initial description of Stresemannia bougainvillea is next to my thumb.

My internship lasted six weeks, but it did not feel like that long. I hope that BHL will use my code to analyze larger sets of data and/or data at a higher level (for example, how is BHL doing at collecting literature on Kingdom Animalia?).

Through conducting my project, I’ve learned that things you learn in library school really do apply to the real world, how an academic library at an institution without students functions, and the workflow behind digitizing materials that appear in BHL and on the Smithsonian Digital Library. I’ve learned that library tools we take for granted can be unreliable, but aren’t usually, and that getting help from people who do research on ferns and those who do speak German can be very beneficial. I hope to bring the things I’ve learned back to my final two semesters of library school, as well as into my hoped-for career as a science librarian after I graduate.

________________________

About the Author

Becca Greenstein is getting her Master’s in Library Science at UNC-Chapel Hill. For her Bachelor’s degree, she went to Carleton College, where she majored in Biology and minored in Chinese. After graduating from Carleton, she worked as a lab technician at the University of Minnesota before starting library school. After she graduates, she hopes to continue honing these skills while working in an academic or special library as a science librarian.

The National Park Service, Historic Surveys, and the Hunt for Documentation

$
0
0
By Lesley Parilla
Cataloging Coordinator
The Field Book Project

“The Grand Canyon of the Yellowstone” by Thomas Moran, artist for Hayden Survey 1871. Smithsonian American Art Museum, Gift of George D. Pratt. Courtesy of Wikipedia Commons.

This year is the National Park Service's Centennial anniversary. In recognition, we thought we would take a look at one of the geological surveys that inspired the founding of Yellowstone National Park. In recent months, researchers in increasing numbers have looked for specimens and field documentation relating to Yellowstone, specifically from the Hayden Geological Survey of 1871. This survey is important for a number of reasons. It was the first federally funded survey, and was instrumental in introducing the American public to Yellowstone's natural wonders. It inspired Congress to establish Yellowstone as the first national park in 1872.

Smithsonian is a repository for specimens and documentation from the Hayden Geological Survey and numerous others relating to the U.S. territories during the nineteenth century. However, it can be surprisingly challenging to find the documentation and specimens from these surveys. This challenge is not unique. Any researcher who has worked with historic material can attest to the challenges of locating materials as decades and centuries pass. Smithsonian Institution was the main repository for the Hayden Geological Survey, but field notes and specimens can end up in many other places. Expedition members may have taken specimens and documentation back to their home institutions, specimens may have been loaned to researchers, others may have been kept as personal mementoes. 

The Hayden Survey of 1871 provides an example, because it not only demonstrates the importance of the primary documentation (these specimens and field notes provide a baseline of description for studying Yellowstone's changing environment), but also how documentation scatter, even when it relates to such a well-known survey. The challenges discussed are prime reasons Natural Sciences institutions around the world are working diligently to make their materials and description available online, so that even if the materials are physically separated, they can be reconnected digitally.

Where are the specimens? 


Leslie Hale, Curator at the Division of Mineral Sciences, National Museum of Natural History, shared some of her experience trying to locate these materials for researchers. “By all accounts, every rock they picked up on every Yellowstone expedition of the 1870’s allegedly came here. But I have only located a few drawers full…. I have been able to identify rocks collected in [subsequent Hayden surveys] ’72, ’73, and ’78, but none that I am certain are from that so-important first trip in 1871. There are specimen labels, but that’s it, no field notebooks or any other ancillary documentation.”

Geyserite (Catalog number 28980) from upper geyser basin and Obsidian (Catalog number 10570) collected at Yellowstone during the Hayden Geological Surveys. Specimens are part of the Volcanology and Petrology collection at the Department of Mineral Sciences, National Museum of Natural History.

It turns out that the specimens can have a pretty interesting journey of their own, due to changing norms in scientific disciplines and institutions over the decades. During much of the Smithsonian’s history, curator positions could be honorary and thus not always a paid position. Leslie shared, “It was not uncommon for them [curators] to remove specimens as payment. I believe that is what happened to most of these specimens.”

So where are these specimens now? Some went to other institutions, most likely with Survey participants. Some are now in private collections as some institutions have sold off portions of their rock and mineral collections (as did, for example, the Philadelphia Academy of Sciences in 2011).

Where are the field notes? 


Hayden used his field notes to compose an extensive report that described the expedition work in the Yellowstone area during 1871. The notes were subsequently lost. This loss has been particularly troubling since other publications prepared from the field notes or Hayden’s personal recollections years later contain errors that cannot be checked against the original source.


Hayden Survey participants at dinner during 1872. Includes West, Carrington, Taggart, William H. Jackson, Jay Cox, Clifford De V. Negley, and William Henry Holmes. Smithsonian Institution Archives. Record Unit 95, Box 56, Folder 2. 1872.

Luckily other field notes and letters from the expedition exist. However these cannot provide as full a picture as the expedition leader’s notes. In 1999, a book was published by University of Nebraska Press entitled Yellowstone and the Great West: Journals, Letters, and Images from the 1871 Hayden Expedition, which pieced together a description of the expedition from the diaries of George Nelson Allen (geologist) and Albert C. Peale (mineralogist) and correspondence by expedition members. In order to create a comprehensive narrative, Merrill (the book’s editor) relied on correspondence from expedition members found in numerous archives across the country, including the Library of Congress, U.S. Geological Survey Field Registry Library (Colorado), National Archives, Academy of Natural Sciences in Philadelphia, and Oberlin College Archives (Ohio) just to name a few.

This published work only serves to demonstrate how much was lost with Hayden’s notes. According to a review published during 2000 in ISIS, a journal of the history of science society, the selected diary entries and correspondence demonstrate that Hayden was significantly involved in the expedition’s scientific work, far more than initially believed. The fate of Hayden’s field notes was not unique for the survey. Journals from the survey in general are difficult to locate or were also lost. According to the book’s preface, Allen’s and Peale’s journals are the only known unpublished journals to still exist.

Where are the publications? 


In 1872, Hayden used his field notes to compose a single report covering the 1871 survey, entitled Preliminary report of the United States Geological Survey of Montana, and portions of adjacent territories : being a fifth annual report of progress, which is available in Internet Archive and will shortly be available in BHL. His final report documented several years' worth of his surveys in the field.

Illustration of the Grand Geyser, the tallest predictable geyser known. It was named by Dr. F.V. Hayden in 1871. Preliminary report of the United States Geological Survey of Montana, and portions of adjacent territories : being a fifth annual report of progress. (1872).

Also available through BHL is a Catalogue and index of the publications of the Hayden, King, Powell, and Wheeler surveys (1904), which provides a list of publications relating to the study of specimens in numerous fields collected during the Survey.

The rest of the story… 


The survey of 1871 was one of several that Hayden directed as part of the U.S. Geological and Geographical Survey of the Territories during 1867-1879. He was one of four men, (Clarence King, George Wheeler, and John Wesley Powell) who defined exploration of the western U.S. territories during the 1860’s and 1870’s. Reports describing his explorations and those of Powell, Wheeler and King can be found on the Biodiversity Heritage Library.

Sketch by William Henry Holmes, drawn during 1872 Hayden Geological Survey. Random records of a lifetime, 1846-1931 [actually 1932]. Digitized by Smithsonian Libraries for The Field Book Project.

Primary source materials from later Hayden surveys to Yellowstone can be found in Smithsonian Institution holdings, including The William Henry Holmes autobiography (typewritten manuscripts detailing Holmes’ life and work), which are held by the American Art and Portrait Gallery Library. Holmes was appointed as the artist-topographer on the Hayden Survey in 1872. In 1874 he was appointed assistant geologist, and he served in this capacity during the 1878 Hayden Survey. Two of Holmes’ volumes have been digitized and are currently available in Internet Archive (vol. 2 | vol. 3). The third volume specifically deals with the 1872 and 1878 Hayden Surveys. Both volumes will be added to the BHL collection soon.

William Henry Holmes with other members of the Hayden Survey, at the U.S. National Museum, circa 1930. Smithsonian Institution Archives, Record Unit 311, Box 27, Folder 7.

The story of the 1871 survey highlights the risks to documentation, even from a historically important expedition that appealed to the public of its day and produced important changes in the nation, including our first national park. Documentation can end up in seemingly disparate locations; through online consortiums these materials are being made available in new ways, restoring important historic context, sometimes lost for decades.
Viewing all 926 articles
Browse latest View live